K.S.GUPTA
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) – Respondent
( 1 ) PETITIONER No. 1 is the husband, petitioners 3 and 4 are parents-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is brother-in-law of Smt. Geeta on whose complaint dated 12/07/2001 made to Crime Against Women Cell, case under Section 498-A was registered on 14/07/2001. Contention advanced by Mr. Alvi is that allegations made in FIR are vague inasmuch as date, month and year of alleged demand and beating have not been disclosed therein. However, on the other hand, Shri Kapoor has invited my attention to the supplementary statement of complainant recorded on 27/07/2001 wherein some of the instances of demand and infliction of cruelty have been disclosed. Obviously those instances were within the knowledge of complainant on the date she made complaint on 12/07/2001. In the facts and circumstances of case, petitioners are admitted to anticipatory bail. In the event of their arrest, they will be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000. 00 with the surety in like amount each to the satisfaction of SHO/i. O. concerned. They will, however, join investigation as and when required by the I. O. Dasti. Anticipatory Bail granted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.