VIKRAMAJIT SEN
THOMSON PRESS INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MEGH AND COMPANY – Respondent
(January 20,2000) 2000 (TLS)101376
2000-DLT-84-475 :: 2000-AD (Del)-3-238
THOMSON PRESS INDIA LIMITED Vs. Megh and Company
Vikramajit Sen,. J.
( 1 ) THIS application has been filed under the provisions of Order XII Rule 6, although at the time of arguments Order VIII Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code was also pressed into support by learned counsel for the Plaintiff. It is prayed in the application that the suit be decreed since, in the Written Statement filed on behalf of Defendants 3 and 4, the statements of facts contained in the plaint have been admitted. Defendants 3 and 4 have filed a Reply to this application in which it has been submitted that the Written Statement should be read as a whole and that if so read it would not reveal any admission on their part. In support of this submission learned counsel for Defendants 3 and 4 relied on Dudh Nath Pandey (Dead By L. R s) V. Suresh Chandra Bhattasali (dead by L. R s), AIR 1986 SC 1509. This case undoubtedly sets down the proposition canvassed by him. However, it has to be seen, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, whether in fact admissions have been made in the Written Statement of the averments
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.