SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 232

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
NARINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
AMAR JEET SINGH SETHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.SANGHVI, A.S.CHANDHIOK, Chitra Gera, L.K.Bhushan, RAVI GUPTA

Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) THE facts of the present case are not disputed between the parties, who are siblings of each other. The two Plaintiffs are the sisters of the Defendant No. 1. All of them being the children of late Smt. Gobind Kaur and late Lt. Col. U. S. Sethi. The dispute between them pertains to property bearing No. B-7/6, Safdarjang Enclave, New Delhi. A Collaboration Agreement has been executed by Defendant No. 1 with Defendant No. 2 in respect of the development of this property.

( 2 ) THE original Lease of the plot was in the name of late Smt. Gobind Kaur who expired on 16. 4. 1976. In his Written Statement Defendant No. 1 has staled that she left behind a Will dated 1. 10. 1974, but whilst this document has been mentioned in the List of Documents filed along with the Written Statement it has not been filed. The reason for this non-filing is that it is misplaced. Shri A. S. Chandhiok, Learned Senior counsel for Defendant No. 1, in the course of arguments, had stated that no reliance was being placed on this Will because of its non-availability. This document will not engage my attention any further but I am constrained, however, to observe that the mystery behind thi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top