VIKRAMAJIT SEN
NARINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
AMAR JEET SINGH SETHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts of the present case are not disputed between the parties, who are siblings of each other. The two Plaintiffs are the sisters of the Defendant No. 1. All of them being the children of late Smt. Gobind Kaur and late Lt. Col. U. S. Sethi. The dispute between them pertains to property bearing No. B-7/6, Safdarjang Enclave, New Delhi. A Collaboration Agreement has been executed by Defendant No. 1 with Defendant No. 2 in respect of the development of this property.
( 2 ) THE original Lease of the plot was in the name of late Smt. Gobind Kaur who expired on 16. 4. 1976. In his Written Statement Defendant No. 1 has staled that she left behind a Will dated 1. 10. 1974, but whilst this document has been mentioned in the List of Documents filed along with the Written Statement it has not been filed. The reason for this non-filing is that it is misplaced. Shri A. S. Chandhiok, Learned Senior counsel for Defendant No. 1, in the course of arguments, had stated that no reliance was being placed on this Will because of its non-availability. This document will not engage my attention any further but I am constrained, however, to observe that the mystery behind thi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.