SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 123

R.S.SODHI
SATISH KUMAR GOEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.MITTAL, K.T.S.Tulsi, P.N.LEKHI, R.K.SAINI, SANJIV KUMAR

Anil Dev Singh

( 1 ) THIS is a writ petition whereby the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to register an FIR in terms of the report/complaint made by the petitioner and for direction to respondents to pay a suitable compensation to the petitioner for the agony, harassment and torture suffered by him at the hands of the respondents.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claims that Head Constable Suresh Chand of Police Station Maya Puri came to his shop located at Maya Puri Phase-II, Delhi and demanded a monthly payment of Rs. 500. 00 from him which the other shopkeepers of the area were regularly paying to the police. On the refusal of the petitioner to pay the amount, the Head Constable threatened him of dire consequences. Again on May 12, 1998 at about 7 p. m. Head Constable Suresh accompanied with three other Constables of Police Station Maya Puri visited his shop and forcibly took away his younger brother Shri Pramod Goel and his servant to Police Station Maya Puri for ulterior motive of extorting money. Thereupon Pramod Goel called up one of his friend Balraj, a Constable in the Delhi Police on telephone. Pursuant to the call Balraj came to thepolice Station and enquired from SHO






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top