( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 5. 10. 1996 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi directing framing the impugned charges under Sections 498-A/406/506/509/34, Indian Penal Code against the petitioners.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to this revision are that the complainant Ms. Bharri Saran was married to the accused Sudhanshu Saran on 2nd June, 1994. The married life of Sudhanshu Saran and Ms. Bharti Saran, according to the prosecution, lacked connubial felicity and was marked by constant bickerings and quarrels. The cause for this discord being the perverted sexual behaviour of the accused Sudhanshu Saran and the demand of dowry. It is the prosecution case that Sudhanshu Saran was constantly subjecting the complainant Ms. Bharti Saran to corporeal intransigence. The petitioner No. 1 is the step-brother and the petitioner No. 2 Ms. Bandana Vajpaye is the step-sister of the accused Sudhanshu Saran. On 28. 1. 1995, the complainant Ms. Bharti Saran lodged a written report at the Police Station Tilak Marg against her husband including the petitioners. Investigation pursuant thereto culminated in submission of a charge shee