SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 358

CYRIAC JOSEPH, DEVENDER GUPTA
B. L. WADHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.N.SALVE, K.C.MITTAL, K.RAVAL, M.S.BUTALIA, MANINDER SINGH, P.N.LEKHI, S.B.JAISINGHANI

Cyriac Joseph, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioner Dr. b. L. Wadehra is a practising advocate. He has filed this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in public interest. The provocation for filing this Petition is the situation arising out of the lawyers strike which has been going on for more than one month demanding an enquiry by a Sitting Judge of the Supreme Court into the circumstances leading to the use of force and the lathicharge by the police on the lawyers during their parliament March on 24th February, 2000 and also the immediate suspension of the police officials responsible for the lathi-charge. The Petitioner states that though he is a. part of the lawyers fraternity and is a participant in the strike, he has approached this Court with a disturbed feeling that the continued stalemate can lead to further unhealthy developments. According to him, in order to avoid further complications and to ensure resolution of the disputes in an orderly, civilised and constitutional manner the problem needs to be tackled al this stage, instead of allowing the partics to continue their Fight with hardened and inflexible attitudes. The petitioner feels that the best cours








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top