SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 596

MUKUL MUDGAL
SUMER ARORA – Appellant
Versus
DOMINOS PIZZA INDIA LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY ROY, D.N.RAY, Mriganga Dutta, P.S.SHROFF, RAJIV NAYAR, RAJIVE MEHRA

Mukul Mudgal

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, filed by a Franchisee of the respondent- M/s Domino s Pizza India Ltd. , who are the Master Franchisee of the parent company, Domino s Pizza International Incorporate Ltd. based at USA. The petitioner has contended that the Franchisee Agreement required from him considerable financial input of about Rs. 70 lacs apart from the valuable site and the superstructure that the petitioner already owned, in order to set up the Domino s franchise at Gurgaon.

( 2 ) THE petitioner submits that the store was opened on 13. 9. 98. The principal terms of the agreement between the petitioner and the respondent in so far as they are relevant are that the franchise was for a period of ten years, renewable for a further period of 10 years on terms agreeable mutually. Upfront franchise fee of Rs. 5 lacs was to be paid by the petitioner besides the payment of 6 per cent of monthly sale of the store as franchisee fee and 4 per cent of the monthly sales were to be given to the respondent for advertisement and promotion of authorised products of the respondent. The





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top