SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 554

DEVENDER GUPTA, S.K.AGARWAL
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GITA LUTHRA, OM PRAKASH AGRAWAL

Devindra Gupta

( 1 ) THESE three appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment since question of fact and law are same and similar. The land, which is the subject in matter of these appeals situated in village Kondli was acquired lor Planned Development of Delhi. For I he lands, which are subject matter of R. F. A. No. 603 and 604 of 1992 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1897 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as "the Act") was published on 17. 11. 1980 and for the lands, subject matter of RFA. No. 601/92, the said notification under Section 4 was published on 25. 2. 1981. It was followed by separate declarations issued in Section 6 of the Act. For the lands covered by notification dated 17. 11. 1990, Collector Land Acquisition made his Award No. 80/82-83 and for the lands covered by notification dated 25. 2. 1981 he made Award No. 57/81-82. Compensation was assessed and offered hy the Collector Land Acquisition at a uniform. rate of Rs. 8,500. 00 per bigha. Feeling dissatisfied the claimants sought references. Reference Court through a common judgment delivered on 20. 8. 1992 answered the references and while masking determination enhanced the amount holding



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top