DEVENDER GUPTA, S.K.AGARWAL
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE three appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment since question of fact and law are same and similar. The land, which is the subject in matter of these appeals situated in village Kondli was acquired lor Planned Development of Delhi. For I he lands, which are subject matter of R. F. A. No. 603 and 604 of 1992 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1897 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as "the Act") was published on 17. 11. 1980 and for the lands, subject matter of RFA. No. 601/92, the said notification under Section 4 was published on 25. 2. 1981. It was followed by separate declarations issued in Section 6 of the Act. For the lands covered by notification dated 17. 11. 1990, Collector Land Acquisition made his Award No. 80/82-83 and for the lands covered by notification dated 25. 2. 1981 he made Award No. 57/81-82. Compensation was assessed and offered hy the Collector Land Acquisition at a uniform. rate of Rs. 8,500. 00 per bigha. Feeling dissatisfied the claimants sought references. Reference Court through a common judgment delivered on 20. 8. 1992 answered the references and while masking determination enhanced the amount holding
Ram Kumar and Others v. Union of India
State of Uttar pradesh v. Major Jitendra Kumar
Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai (deceased by L.Rs) v. State of Gujrat
Rupinder Handa v. Union of India
Chander and Others v. Union of India
Special Tehsildar Land Acquiaaition Vishakapatnam v. A. mangala Gowri AIR 1992 SC 666
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.