SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 565

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI, B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
RAJIV GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S.Kapashera, Rajender Prasad Singh, Y.D.NAGAR

M. S. A. Siddiqui

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No. 5 to arrest his father (respondent No. 4) in connection with the Case FIR No. 93/98 under Sections 380/ 406, Indian Penal Code registered at the Police Station Nazafgarh.

( 2 ) IT is undisputed that the respondent No. 4, Mr. L. R. Gupta, Senior Advocate, for this Court is father of the petitioner. Respondent No. 2, Sanjay Gupta is the younger brother of the petitioner and respondent No. 3 is the wife of respondent No. 2. On 7. 3. 1998, the petitioner lodged a report at the Police Station Nazafgarh charging Mr. L. R. Gupta with having committed theft of his firearms as well as the arms licences. Consequently, FIR No. 93/98 under Sections 380/406, Indian Penal Code was registered at the Police Station Nazafgarh. According to the petitioner, on 19. 3. 1998 the said firearms as well as licences were recovered from the bedroom of his father (respondent No. 4 ). After recovery of the alleged stolen property Inspector Mahesh , Kumar attempted to arrest the respondent No. 2 but he was wrongfully prevented from. doing so by the Police Commissioner, D








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top