SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 600

ARIJIT PASAYAT
K. L. CHAWLA – Appellant
Versus
S. M. AGARWAL, SPECIAL JUDGES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Soni, MOHIT MATHUR

Arijit Pasayat

( 1 ) ORDER passed by Special Judge, Delhi in Corruption Case No. 81/81 dated 25. 2. 1982 is the subject matter of challenge. According to petitioner (hereinafter referred to as accused also), the order contained a direction to the investigating agency to file a charge-sheet which is impermissible.

( 2 ) BACKGROUND facts in a nut-shell, as presented by the prosecution, are as follows:- Accused while working as an Upper Division Clerk in office of the Land Development Officer, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi allegedly accepted bribe for getting mutation work done in respect of a property in House No. 4/1, Subhash Nagar. Dr. Om Parkash Chandna of Subhash Nagar in his capacity as General Attorney-cum-owner of the said house had applied lo Land and Development Officer tor sale permission in July 1978. Accused visited doctor s clinic on 22nd February 1979 and gave him two copies of the sale permission. He had also brought the original file of the property, and demanded a sum of Rs. 400. 00for getting the mutation work done. The deal was struck. Doctor confirmed on a telephone call made to accused that if he visits his clinic for the purpose of collecting the agreed sum on the e











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top