MUKUL MUDGAL
ANU SETH – Appellant
Versus
ROHIT NARAIN SETH – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff No. 1 is the wife of defendant No. 1 and the plaintiffs 2 and 3 are their children. Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are the parents, and defendant No. 6 is the brother, defendant No. 4 is the uncle, defendant No. 5 is the aunt, defendant No. 8 is the cousin of defendant No. 1. It is the plaintiff s case that plaintiff No. 1 was married to defendant No. 1 and stayed in the matrimonial home at 6a, Jantar Mantar Road, New Delhi for 8 years. The plaintiff No. 1 has further averred in the plaint that owing to matrimonial disharmony, she left the matrimonial home alongwith plaintiffs 2 and 3 and took shelter in her parents house on 13th August 1999. The plaintiff No. 1 has further stated that she is being denied the access to the matrimonial house by the defendants and consequently seeks a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the ingress and egress of the plaintiffs to her matrimonial home i. e. at 6a, Jantar Mantar, New Delhi. The plaintiff No. 1 has further pleaded that she is seeking access only to the suite marked blue in the site plan in which she was residing with plaintiffs 2 and 3 and defendant No. 1 and this portion o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.