SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 674

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK – Appellant
Versus
SUPER PLASTIC INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NEMO K.PARASARAN, ONKAR PRASHAD

Vikramajit Sen

( 1 ) THIS suit for the recovery of Rs. 2,20,138. 62 on the "basis of mortgaged property" was filed in 1982. After several unsuccessful attempts to serve the defendants in the ordinary manner, this was finally achieved by publication in the Statesman for 14. 12. 1983. The defendants were proceeded ex-parte on that date, as no appearance was entered on their behalf. No efforts have been made to have these orders set aside, or to seek leave to file a written statement, although Mr. V. K. Jain, Advocate, has appeared for defendant No. 1 on several dates of hearing and has even conducted the cross-examination of the Bank s witnesses.

( 2 ) SINCE no written statement has been filed by virtue of Order VIII, Rule 10 it was open to the Court to pronounce judgment against the defendants or make such orders in relation to the suit as it thought fit. Despite the fact that the defendants were proceeded ex-parte on two occasions, this summary procedure was not resorted to by the Court. Shri G. S. Matta, Manager, Regional Office of the plaintiff Bank has been examined. He has deposed that Cash Credit Limited of Rs. 80,000. 00 has been disbursed to defendant No. 1 by Roop Nagar Bran




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top