SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 785

MUKUL MUDGAL
SARITA LAMBA – Appellant
Versus
SATISH JASSAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPAK DHINGRA, F.K.Chadhal

MUKUL MUDGAL

( 1 ) THIS is a petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This petition seeks an order restraining the respondents or their agents from alienating, transferring or parting with possession of the premises in question said to be constructed upon plots bearing Nos. 700-A and 701-A, Village Lado Sarai, New Delhi. It further seeks an appointment of a Receiver for the said property and seeks the deposit of the rent paid to the respondents for the said premises in this Court.

( 2 ) THE petitioner submits as under: Respondent No. 1, Satish Jassal and respondent No. 2, Nagender Singh were acquainted with the petitioner through her husband as being builders and consequently a partnership firm constituting the petitioner and the two respondents was formed. The partnership inter- alia provided that properties shall be purchased from the funds provided by the parties towards their capital and the properties purchased shall be developed and redeveloped and dealt with thereafter so as to accrue profits for the partnership firm and its partners. Accordingly property Nos. 700-A and 701-A measuring 242 sq. yds. was purchased in Villa








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top