SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 834

VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
JATINDER NATH – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Naresh Thanai, SANGITA BHARTI

Vijender Jain

( 1 ) FATHER of the petitioner was allotted Plot No. 48, Masjid Moth Extension Residential Scheme, now known was Udai Pak, New Delhi-49 in an open auction conducted by the Delhi Development Authority. A Lease Deed was executed in his favour by the President of India on 24/7/1973. After the demise of the father of the petitioner the property devolved upon his two sons namely, Jatinder Nath, the present petitioner and his brother Narender Nath. Both the brothers applied for mutation with the DDA. Property was mutated in the name of the petitioner and his brother Narender Nath vide letter of respondent dated 22/7/1993.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the petitioner which is not disputed by the respondent, that petitioner cleared entire amount and nothing is due from him. On account of oral settlement and out of love and affection both the brothers settled the matter with regard to their property and Narender Nath executed a Relinquishment Deed dated 21/12/1998 duly registered in the Office of the Sub-Registrar relinquishing his share in the property in question in favour of his brother Jatinder Nath, who is petitioner before this Court. On the basis of the said Relinquishment Dee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top