DEVENDER GUPTA, MUKUL MUDGAL
SOMANI MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH C. RASWANT – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE applications have been filed by the plaintiffs appellants after disposal of the appeal. By the first application (C. M. 472/2000), the appellants are seeking modification in the order passed on 20. 5. 1999 thereby to allow them time till 31. 3. 2001 to vacate the premises. By the second application (C. M. 473/2000), the appellants are seeking leave to place on record some additional documents in support of the first application. In the third application (Cm. 483/ 2000), the prayer is to stay the appellants dispossession till disposal of the first application.
( 2 ) THE appellants had filed appeal [r. F. A. (OS) 16 of 1999], against the order passed on 31. 8. 1998 in Suit No. 1814/98. By the said order learned Single Judge had rejected the appellants plaint wherein decree had been prayed by the appellants against the defendant/respondent for specific performance to register lease deed for the period from 1. 8. 1998 to 31. 7. 2000 and to grant a decree for declaration that appellant No. 1 is entitled to continue as a tenant in the premises.
( 3 ) DURING pendency of the appeal an application (C. M. 981 /99), was moved jointly by the parties under Order 23,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.