SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 1026

DEVENDER GUPTA, MUKUL MUDGAL
SOMANI MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH C. RASWANT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Chadha, MALINI SUD, RAJIV NAYAR

Devinder Gupta

( 1 ) THESE applications have been filed by the plaintiffs appellants after disposal of the appeal. By the first application (C. M. 472/2000), the appellants are seeking modification in the order passed on 20. 5. 1999 thereby to allow them time till 31. 3. 2001 to vacate the premises. By the second application (C. M. 473/2000), the appellants are seeking leave to place on record some additional documents in support of the first application. In the third application (Cm. 483/ 2000), the prayer is to stay the appellants dispossession till disposal of the first application.

( 2 ) THE appellants had filed appeal [r. F. A. (OS) 16 of 1999], against the order passed on 31. 8. 1998 in Suit No. 1814/98. By the said order learned Single Judge had rejected the appellants plaint wherein decree had been prayed by the appellants against the defendant/respondent for specific performance to register lease deed for the period from 1. 8. 1998 to 31. 7. 2000 and to grant a decree for declaration that appellant No. 1 is entitled to continue as a tenant in the premises.

( 3 ) DURING pendency of the appeal an application (C. M. 981 /99), was moved jointly by the parties under Order 23,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top