SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 1052

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
ANGIRA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY JHA, P.L.BANSAL, R.D.Jolly

Arijit Pasayat

( 1 ) AT the instance of Revenue following question has been referred for opinion of this Court under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short the act ) by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench e (in short the tribunal ):

"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that there was no transfer of the property within the meaning of Section 2 (47) of Income-tax Act, 1961 ?"

( 2 ) FACTUAL position as set out in the statement of case is as follows: Assessee, Smt. Angira Devi is the only daughter of late Shri Raghumal. Her mother was Smt. Bhagwati Devi. Assessee was married to Shri Hans Raj Gupta and had four sons namely, Desh Raj, Shiv Raj, Rajinder Kumar and Mahender Kumar. Raghumal had several immovable and movable properties. By a Will dated 4/09/1926, he bequeathed certain specified amount to several persons named in the Will and appointed his wife and daughter (assessee) and his two nephews as residuary legatees. Several persons were appointed as executors of the Will including one Shri Gopal Das Modi. Raghumal died on 5/09/1926. Dispute started in respect of administration of the estate


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top