SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 29

High Court Of Delhi
D.C.MAJUMDAR - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondent
Civil 2836 of 1995
Decided On : 01/08/1999

Advocates Appeared:
P.N.MISHRA

Pensionary benefits cannot be withheld without a finding of guilt in departmental or judicial proceedings.

Headnote:

PENSION - CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 9 - Withholding of pension - Petitioner, a retired employee, sought release of retirement benefits including gratuity, commutation of pension, and other benefits - Respondents initiated departmental proceedings against the petitioner for alleged misconduct during service - Petitioner contended that pensionary benefits could not be withheld without a finding of guilt in departmental or judicial proceedings - Court held that Rule 9 of the Pension Rules allowed withholding of pension only if the pensioner was found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence in departmental or judicial proceedings - Since no such finding had been made against the petitioner, the respondents were not entitled to withhold his pensionary benefits - Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner's pensionary benefits within two months, with interest at 18% per annum if not released within that time.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a retired employee, sought release of retirement benefits including gratuity, commutation of pension, and other benefits. The respondents initiated departmental proceedings against the petitioner for alleged misconduct during service. The petitioner contended that pensionary benefits could not be withheld without a finding of guilt in departmental or judicial proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that Rule 9 of the Pension Rules allowed withholding of pension only if the pensioner was found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence in departmental or judicial proceedings. Since no such finding had been made against the petitioner, the respondents were not entitled to withhold his pensionary benefits.

Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to withhold the petitioner's pensionary benefits without a finding of guilt in departmental or judicial proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, which allowed withholding of pension only if the pensioner was found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence in departmental or judicial proceedings. Since no such finding had been made against the petitioner, the Court held that the respondents were not entitled to withhold his pensionary benefits.

Final Decision: The Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner's pensionary benefits within two months, with interest at 18% per annum if not released within that time.

K. Ramamoorthy

( 1 ) THE petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: " (A) allow the writ petition of the petitioner with costs; (B) Issue appropriate writ or. writs, direction or directions, order or orders: (i) directing the respondents to disburse entire retirements benefits such as, gratuity commutation of a portion of pension, pension accrued with effect from 1st day of May, 1994, and other benefits, such as, leave encashment. Group Insurance Scheme benefits etc. together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 1st day of May, 1994, till actual payment; (ii) directing the respondents to produce all records pertaining to sanction and payment retirement and other benefits of the petitioner. (iii) prohibiting the respondents not to proceed against the petitioner detrimental to the interest of the petitioner till the disposal of this writ petition. "

( 2 ) 2. THE petitioner attained the age of superannuation of 60 years on the 30th day of April, 1994. Retiral benefits were not given to him. As such he had approached this Court. The respondent, it is stated, have got the power to take action against the petitioner for his acts of commission or omission under the Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The same reads as under: 9. "right of President to withhold or withdraw pension. (1) The President reserves to himself the right of withholding a pension or gratuity, or both, either in full or in part, or with drawing a pension in full or in part, whether permanently or for a specified period, and of ordering recovering from a pension or gratuity of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused to the Government, if, in any departmental or judicial proceedings, the pensioner is found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence during the period of service, including service rendered upon re-employment after retirement: Provided that the Union Public Service Commission shall be consulted before any final orders are passed: Provided further that where a part of pension is withheld or withdrawn the amount of such pension shall not be reduced below the amount of rupees three hundred and seventy five per mensern. (2) (a) The departmental proceedings REFERRED TO to in Sub-rule (1), if instituted while the Government servant was in service whether before his retirement or during hisre-employment,shall,after the final retirement of the Government servant, be deemed to be proceedings under this rule and shall be continued and concluded by the authority by which they were commenced in the same manner as if the Government servant had continued in service: Provided that where the departmental proceedings are instituted by an authority subordinate to the President, that authority shall submit a report recording its findings to the President. (b) The departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the Government servant was in service, whether before his retirement, or during his reemployment- (i) shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the President; (ii) shall not be in respect of any event which took place more than four years before such institution; and (iii) shall be conducted by such authority and in such place as the President may direct and in accordance with the procedure applicable to departmental proceedings in which an order of dismissal from service could be made in relation to the Government servant during his service. (3) Deleted. (4) In the case of Government servant who has retired on attaining the age of superannuation or otherwise and against whom any departmental or judicial proceedings are instituted or where departmental proceedings are continued under Sub-rule (2), a provisional pension as provided in Rule 69 shall be sanctioned. (5) Where the President decides not to withhold or withdraw pension but order recovery of pecuniary loss from pension, the recovery shall not ordinarily be made at a rate exceeding one-third of the pension admissible on the date of retirement of a Government servant. (6)









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top