SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 77

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
AMAR CHAND TALWAR – Appellant
Versus
EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL FOR HANDI CRAFTS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.NARULA, RAJAN SHARMA

M. S. A. Siddiqui

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs have filed the application (IA No. 2546/ 98 under Order 12, Rule 6, Civil Procedure Code for judgment on admissions.

( 2 ). To appreciate the merits of the controversy, it will be necessary to give brief narrative of the material facts. The plaintiffs filed the present suit for eviction of the defendant from the 2nd floor of the premises No. 6, Community Centre, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi (hereinafter called the suit premises ) and for recovery of Rs. 8,46,861. 00 as compensation for use and occupation of the suit premises from 1. 7. 1995 to September, 1995 besides future mesne profits @ Rs. one lac per month. According to the plaintiffs, the defendant took the suit premises on rent after executing an unregistered lease deed dated 3. 6. 1986 in favour of the plaintiffs. The rent last paid by the defendant was Rs. 25,094. 00 per month. Since the defendant s tenancy was from month-to-month, the same was terminated w. e. f. 2. 3. 1995 by the notice dated 7. 1. 1995. Despite service of the said notice under Section 106 Transfer of Property Act, the defendant did not vacate the suit premises.

( 3 ). The defendant resisted the suit and in t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top