M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
AMAR CHAND TALWAR – Appellant
Versus
EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL FOR HANDI CRAFTS – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiffs have filed the application (IA No. 2546/ 98 under Order 12, Rule 6, Civil Procedure Code for judgment on admissions.
( 2 ). To appreciate the merits of the controversy, it will be necessary to give brief narrative of the material facts. The plaintiffs filed the present suit for eviction of the defendant from the 2nd floor of the premises No. 6, Community Centre, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi (hereinafter called the suit premises ) and for recovery of Rs. 8,46,861. 00 as compensation for use and occupation of the suit premises from 1. 7. 1995 to September, 1995 besides future mesne profits @ Rs. one lac per month. According to the plaintiffs, the defendant took the suit premises on rent after executing an unregistered lease deed dated 3. 6. 1986 in favour of the plaintiffs. The rent last paid by the defendant was Rs. 25,094. 00 per month. Since the defendant s tenancy was from month-to-month, the same was terminated w. e. f. 2. 3. 1995 by the notice dated 7. 1. 1995. Despite service of the said notice under Section 106 Transfer of Property Act, the defendant did not vacate the suit premises.
( 3 ). The defendant resisted the suit and in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.