SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 130

M.K.SHARMA
YAHOO – Appellant
Versus
AKASH ARORA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SUDHARKAR RAO, BINNI KALRA, Harish Malhotra, KAPIL SIBAL, PARVIN ANAND

Dr. M. K. Sharma

( 1 ) THE present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, (heir partners, servants and agents from operating any business and/ or selling, offering for sale, advertising and in any manner dealing in any services or goods on the Internet or otherwise under the trademark/domain name yahooindia. Com or any other mark/domain name which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiff s trademark yahoo and also for rendition of accounts and damages. The plaintiff has also filed an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, Civil Procedure Code praying for an ad interim temporary injunction restraining the defendants from operating any business and / or selling, offering for sale, advertising and in any manner dealing in any services or goods on the Internet or otherwise under the trademark/domain name yahooindia. Com or any other mark/domain name which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiff s trademark yahoo .

( 2 ) MR. Kapil Sibbal, Counsel appearing for the plaintiff submitted that the plaintiff is the owner of the trademark yahoo and d





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top