SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 92

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
H. L. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.D.GUPTA, INDERJIT SIDDHU, PRAMOD GUPTA

K. Ramamoorthy, J.

( 1 ) THE point involved in the case is covered by the judgement of this court in similar writ petition No. 1091 of 1985. A joint disciplinary Inquiry was started against the petitioner and the petitioner in CW No. 1091/85 by an order dated 23/05/1984. The order reads as under: DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (VIGILANCE BRANCH) ORDER No. 70/vig/84 dt. 23rd May 84 O R D E R

WHEREAS S/shri M. L. Varshney, SH. Dellip Sing, A. e. and H. L. Sharma, J. E. , D. D. A. are jointly concerned in a disciplinary case.

NOW, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by D. D. A. (Salaries, Allowances and Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1961 the undersigned hereby directs:

(1) That disciplinary action against the said officers/ officials shall be taken in common proceedings.

(2) The Vice-Chairman, DDA shall function as Disciplinary Authority in this case for the purpose of common proceedings and shall be competent to impose the penalties prescribed in Regulations 14 of the said Regulations.

(3) The Procedure prescribed in Regulations 16 of the said Regulation shall be followed in the said proceedings.

(H. C. Khanna)

( 2 ) THE writ petition filed by Mr. M. L. Varshney. His Lords














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top