SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 131

J.B.GOEL
ASHOK KAUSHIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.T.Singh, D.C.MATHUR, R.M.JOHN

J. B. Goel, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code ) and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the legality and correctness of the two orders, one dated 1/2/1994 taking congnizance of the offence against the petitioner and the other dated 21/2/95, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (M. M.) (case FIR No. 516/92, P. S. Malviya Nagar, New Delhi) whereby the petitioner s applications under Section 294 read with Section 311 of the Code have been dismissed.

( 2 ) A prayer has also been made that in the facts and circumstances of the case the proceedings arising of the FIR are liable to be quashed against the petitioner.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY, the facts giving rise to the present case are that one Smt. Sushila Wadhwa (now deceased) was the owner of property bearing No. E-1/16, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi, formerly a single storeyed house. She had sent a complaint dated 2/10/92 to the Commissioner of Police and others on which FIR No. 516/92 was registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi on 2/11/1992 under Sections 420/468/471/342/165-B; and after completing investigation a report

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top