SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 107

MOHD.SHAMIM
AKESH KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
HARMEET SINGH BAKSHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KAMAL MEHTA, Niraj Malhotra, VIPIN SANGHI

Mohd. Shamim

( 1 ) AN application by plaintiffs under Section 151 of thecode of Civil Procedure for permission to dig up a tubewell/borewell of sufficientdepth in the backyard of the suit premises at their own expense for their exclusiveuse and enjoyment. They further want through the present application to allow theplaintiffs to put their exclusive use two overhead water tanks out of the fouroverhead water tanks for their own exclusive use and enjoyment and for supplyingthe water on the first floor i. e. the tenanted accommodation in occupation of theplaintiffs.

( 2 ). A few facts for the proper appreciation of the points in controversy before thiscourt are as under: that the plaintiffs are the tenants of defendant No. 1 on the firstfloor of property bearing No. D-l 059, New Friends Colony, New Delhi since 1980 ona monthly rent of Rs. 2,530. 00. Defendant No. 1 in collusion with defendant No. 2 arebringing pressure on the plaintiffs in different ways in order to compel them tovacate the tenanted accommodation. Hence, the plaintiffs are compelled to institutethe present suit. The water supply to the tenanted accommodation in occupation ofthe plaintiffs is through a tubewell installe














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top