SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 168

S.N.KAPUR
PRADIP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.J.S.AHLUVALIA, N.K.Singh

S. N. KAPOOR, J. (ORAL)

( 1 ) THIS petition u/s 397/401 read with Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code is directed against the order dated 2nd February 1999 passed by a Metropolitan Magistrate. There is no dispute that the applicant was facing trial for offence u/s 292 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code committed on dated 30th October 1988. The accused was arrested on the same day at the spot. Charge was framed on 4th October 1993. It appears from the order sheets of various dates that the prosecution failed to examine any witness before 2nd February 1999. This is so despite the fact that the learned Metropolitan Magistrate repeatedly issued warrants against the witnesses to procure their attendance when police witnesses were served but they did not appear.

( 2 ) ON 21st November 1998, an application was moved by the accused for discharging the accused in the light of the order passed by the Supreme Court in Raj Deo Sharma Vs. State of Bihar, 1998 Cri. LJ 4596. The relevant portion of the judgment reads as under:

(I) "in cases where the trial is for an offence punishable with imprisonment fora period not exceeding seven years, whether the accused is injail or not, the Court shall















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top