SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 162

MOHD.SHAMIM
RAMA KANTA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
M. S. JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Kumar Sinha, RAMESH CHANDRA, Valmiki Mehta

Mohd. Sharnim, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a suit for recovery of possession over a portion of the property bearing No. 49/7, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi, shown by red colour in the plan annexed with the plaint ( hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the disputed property for the sake of convenience) and for recovery of mesne profits to the tune of Rs. 1400. 00 for use and occupation of the same. The plaintiff also claims pendente lite and future mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 2100. 00 per mensem.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts which are required to be gone into for the purposes of disposal of the present suit are as under: that the plaintiff is the sole owner of the property bearing house No. 49, Roadno. 7, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi. The plot of land for construction of the said house was purchased by the plaintiff from one Shri Tek Chand through registered sale deed dated April 25, 1964. The disputed property was was got mutated in the name of the plaintiff in the record of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi on June 17, 1964. The construction of the disputed property on the said plot was got done during the years 1964-65. The completion and occupancy certificate dated January 13, 1965 was also issued in favour of t



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top