M.K.SHARMA
SUBHASH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose of the application registered as I. A. No. 3055/1996 filed by the defendant under Order 9 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure as also I. A. 3504/1996 filed by the defendant under section 5 of the Limitation Act.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff instituted a suit against the defendant for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1. 34 lakhs with interest contending inter alia that the aforesaid amount was collected by the defendant from the plaintiff as transfer limit without any authority of law. The defendant contested the suit by filing written statement contending inter alia that such a transfer limit was permissible and legal. In the suit 10 issues were framed by this court and the suit was thereafter listed for trial. On 1/5/1992 statement of Public Witness 1 was recorded in presence of counsel for both the parties. However, on the subsequent date of trial i. e. on 26/7/1993 three witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff were present, but as the counsel for the defendant was not present the trial was adjourned till the next date. However, the counsel for the defendant was also not present on the next date but the court recorded the evidence of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.