SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 160

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
ALFRED DUNHILL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KARTAR SINGH MAKKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P.SINGH, M.R.Bhalerao, PARVIN ANAND, V.P.Singh

M. S. A. SIDDIQUI,j.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed this suit seeking injunction against the defendant to prevent passing off and rendition of accounts. Along with the plaint, the plaintiff has also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code. for interim injunction.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of England and has its principal office at 30, Duke Street, St. Jame s London, Swix6dl, United Kingdom. The plaintiff is a highly reputed company engaged in the business, inter alia of manufacturing and marketing a wide variety of goods including ready-made garments and other textile articles under the trademark dunhill. The trade mark dunhill has been used on a very extensive scale for very many years. The products of plaintiff are known all over the world and the trademark dunhill belonging to plaintiff company has acquired global reputation. Plaintiff s various products are available for sale at the duty free shops and stores of the Indian Armed Services. The plaintiff is the exclusive owner of the following registrations of the trade mark dunhill in India as detailed in para No. 16 of the plaint: -.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top