SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 221

S.N.KAPUR, USHA MEHRA
MANGTOO MANGOO – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.Lonial, PINKY ANAND

USHA MEHRA,j.

( 1 ) THE learned Land Acquisition Collector Mr. Ravi Dadhich, SDM, Preet Vihar has produced on record a letter dated 31st July, 1997 addressed to this Court under special reference No. 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (In Short the Act ). Along with that letter a statement showing the particulars of the parties and the Khasra Numbers, total areas thereof and the share of the appellants have also been mentioned. Copy of the same had been given to Mr. M. L. Lonial, who accepts the position indicated in this statement regarding Khasra numbers and the shares of the appellants mentioned in the same.

( 2 ) WE have gone through the paper book which shoves that before the learned Additional District Judge could deliver his order on the reference made under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Land Acquisition Collector sent an additional revised statement under Section 19 in LAC No. 144/76. The same was forwarded to the learned Additional District Judge, wherein detial of the Khasra Numbers, shares and the kind of soil we mentioned. However, while delivering the impugned order, it appears the learned Additional District Judge did not take into count the additional revised








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top