SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 309

ARUN KUMAR, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
RAIL INDIA TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC SERVICES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
I. M. PURI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAGJIT SINGH CHAWLA, S.P.AGARWAL, Vijay Kishan

Arun Kumar, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal the appellant has assailed the judgment and decree dated 19th November, 1997 passed by the trial court. By the impugned judgment and decree, the learned Addl. District Judge Delhi decreed the suit for possession filed by the respondents against the appellant herein with respect to premises described as flat No. 611, 6th floor, Arunachal Building, 19, Barakhambha Road, New Delhi. The trial court further passed a decree for mesne profits in the sum of Rs. 2,38,686. 00 covering the period from 1st July, 1994 till 31st January, 1995 along with interest @ 18% per annum on the said amount from the date of filing of the suit till recovery. The decree further directs that the defendant (appellant herein) will pay mesne profits for use and occupation of the premises @ Rs. 100. 00 per sq. ft. per month with effect from the date of institution of the suit till handing over possession of the premises.

( 2 ) THE respondent had filed a caveat through Shri Vijay Kishan, Advocate. Therefore, counsel for both the parties appeared at the time of hearing of this appeal. The counsel for the parties also placed copies of the pleadings in the suit as well as copies of
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top