SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 426

M.K.SHARMA
STANDIPACK PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
OSWAL TRADING COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.PATNEY, H.P.SINGH, MANMOHAN SINGH, P.N.LEKHI, Sadhana Sharma

M. K. Sharma

( 1 ) BY this common order I propose to dispose of the applications registered as I. A. 11829/1998,774/1999 and 775/1999 in Suit No. 2391 /199. S; I. A. 9131/1996and1530/1997insuitno. 2428/1996;i. A. 1207/1997,2588/1997and3368/1997 in Suit No. 289/1997; I. A. 7489/1995 in Suit No. 1669/1994, I. A. 7749/1996 in Suit No. 1970/1995, I. A. 9132/1996 and 4746/1998 in Suit No. 2427/1996 and I. A. 7374/1995 in C. O. No. 25/1995. For convenience sake, the plaintiff in Suit No. 2391 /1998, M/s. Standipack Private Limited is being described as the plaintiff throughout in the present order and the other parties are described as defendants. Injunction applications have been filed by the plaintiff seeking for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing or using the patented pouch of the plaintiff. The case sought to be made out by the plaintiff in the injunction applications is that the patent in respect of pouch for storage and dispensing of a liquid such as lubricating oil was granted to the plaihtiff by the Controller of Patents. Corresponding patents have also been granted to the plaintiff in various other developed countries including USA, Europe and Aus
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top