B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
UMA MITRA – Appellant
Versus
DY. DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), DISTRICT NEW DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner is a Maths Teacher in the fourth respondent School. She became eligible to be promoted as PGT on the post of PGT (Maths) which fell vacant on the 1st of April, 1995. The DPC of the school made the selection and from the 10th of July, 1995, the petitioner has been working as PGT (Maths) in the School. Seeking the approval, the fourth respondent, management, wrote to the Education Officer, Zone 26, New Delhi in the following terms:-
"i am directed to inform you, as per instruction of the Chairman of the Managing Committee of the School that the order of vacancies as mentioned in our previous letter No. SPV/42/1995-90 dated 23. 6. 95 may be amended to record according to the date of creation of vacancies as mentioned below:- 1. The post of PGT (Hist) from the 5th Jan. 95. 2. The post of PGT (Econ) from the 1st Feb. 95. 3. The post of PGT (Maths) from the 1st April 95. It may also be stated that according to your views for keeping reservation 40 point roster for promotions also will not be applicable to the post of PGT (Maths) which is a general category vacancy. The vacancies for 1 and 2 cannot be filled up by promotion as there is no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.