SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 434

J.B.GOEL
MOHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lekh Raj Rahalia, PAVAN BAHL

J. B. Goel,j.

( 1 ) THIS petition undersection 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code ) seeks to quash the proceedings and also the order dated 23. 6. 1995 passed by die learned M. M. , Delhi and order dated 27. 8. 96 passed by the learned A. S. J. in revision on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY facts giving rise to the present petition are that one Smt. Poonam Sharma had lodged a complaint dated 30. 7. 1992 with the Crime Against Women Cell, New Delhi (for short CAW ). On the said complaint being forwarded by the latter FIR No. 480/92 under Section 406, Indian Penal Code was registered at P. S. Vikas Puri, New Delhi. After completing investigation, charge-sheet under Section 173, Criminal Procedure Code was submitted against all the petitioners for offences under Sections 498-A and 406, IPC. The learned M. M. took cognizance and summoned the petitioners-accused. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 6 respectively are die husband, the mother-in-law, brother-in-law (Jeth), father-in-law, sister-in-law (Jethani) and the brother-in-law (Dewar) of the complainant. After hearing the parties learned M. M. vide order dated 23. 6. 1995 held that the charges













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top