SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 325

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
VAKIL CHAND BINDAL – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.DEWAN, R.K.Khanna

M. S. A. Siddiqui,j.

( 1 ) BY the agreement No. 5/ee/sed/87-88 dated 30. 9. 1987, the petitioner was awarded the work of construction of cement concrete paths and pavements in pocket-C, SFS Houses, Section-F, Sarita Vihar, Delhi. As per the agreement, the work was to start on 10. 10. 1987 and was to be completed on or before 9. 2. 1988. However, the work could not be started within the stipulated period and the contract was rescinded on 21. 3. 1988. Disputes and differences between the parties in respect of the contract in question were REFERRED TO the arbitrator, who gave his award on 30. 4. 1992. On 27. 4. 1993, the arbitrator Mr. A. L. Garg filed his award. Notice of filing of the award was given to the parties. The respondent DDA filed objections under Sections 30/33 of the Arbitration Act against the award, which have been opposed by the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE objections of the DDA having been opposed, the following issues were framed:

1. Whether the award is liable to be set aside on the grounds of objections raised by the respondent in the objection petition?

2. Relief and costs.

(CLAIM No. 1 and counter claim No. 1)

( 3 ) WHILE claimant contractor claimed refund of earnest mone













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top