SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 372

DALVEER BHANDARI
NAND KISHORE MEHRA – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILA MEHRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARPRIT SINGH, K.N.Kataria, N.S.Bajwa

Dalveer Bhandari, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff filed a suit for declaration. The plaintiff prayed that he is the true owner of the properties bearing No. B-80, Greater Kailash I, New Delhi and plot No. 9, Anand Industrial Estate, Village Arthala, Distt. Ghaziabad (U. P.) and he be declared as a true owner of these properties. 2. This Court on 28th January, 1992 issued summons and notice to the defendant and also restrained the defendant from selling and parting with possession of the property bearing No. B-80, Greater Kailash I, New Delhi. It may be pertinent to mention that the plainti ff did not press the relief with regard to plot No. 9, Anand Industrial Estate, 672 Village Arthala, Distt. Ghaziabad (U. P.) therefore, this judgment is confined to the property bearing No. B-80, Greater Kailash I, New Delhi. 3. In the plaint it is incorporated that the defendant was married to the plaintiff in the year 1954. It is also disclosed in the plaint that before this marriage the plaintiff was married to one Smt. Bimla (the plaintiff s first wife) and has four sons out of that marriage. Similarly the defendant was also already married. The plamtiff used to stay in Bombay where he had extensive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top