SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 432

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
MIRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
DINESH CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.PANDEY, ARUN MOHAN, Gaurav Duggal, V.B.ANDLEY, Vaishali Mehra

M. S. A. Siddiqui, J.

( 1 ) IA No. 11944/92 is an application under Order 12 Rule 6 and under order 40 Rule I read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code. filed by the defendant No. 2 for a judgment on admissions and for appointment of a receiver for the suit properties.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the present suit for partition, rendition of accounts and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs possession over a portion of the property bearing No. . 1607-08, Dariba Kalan, Delhi. According to the plaintiff, her husband Subhash Chand Gupta (since deceased) and Dinesh Chandra (defendant No. 1) were real brothers. They were joint owners of the following properties :-

(I) Property bearing No. 1607-08, Dariba Kalan, Delhi.

(II) Properly bearing No. 818, Chhota Bazar, Kashmeri Gate, Delhi.

(III) Properly No. C-7, Geetanjali, New Delhi.

( 3 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 sold the properly bearing No. 818, during lifetime of Subhash Chand Gupta. Defendant No. 3 is the adopted daughter of Subhash Chand Gupta. There are three shops in the ground floor of the property bearing No. 1607-08, which are in possession of tenants. First and second floor of the said p












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top