SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 502

CYRIAC JOSEPH
VED PRAKASH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
LACHMI CHAND SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.AGGARWAL, A.S.MATHUR, I.S.MATHUR, MUKUL ROHTAGI

CYRIAC JOSEPH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this revision petition is the defendant in the suit and the respondent is the plaintiff therein. The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner in possession of the suit property. The defendant filed written statement claiming title and possession over the suit property. However, the trial court passed a decree of perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property. The defendant filed an appeal in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Delhi on 18-11-1985 against the judgment and decree dated 30-9-1985 passed by Shri Z. S. Solanki, Civil Judge, Delhi. The plaintiff filed reply to the appeal on 26-2-1986. The appeal was adjourned from time to time for arguments. In the meanwhile the appellant/defendant moved an application dated 21-1-1989 under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the code of Civil procedure (for short called the code ) praying that the respondent/plaintiff, his associates, attorneys, employees, servants, friends and relative s be restrained from parting with po













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top