SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 627

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
RELAXO RUBBER LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SELECTION FOOTWEAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhale Rao

Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a suit for permanent injunction, infringement of copyright and trade mark, passing off and rendition of accounts. Summons were ordered to be issued to the defendants on 14. 8. 1998 for the next date of hearing which was 14. 10. 1998. On 14. 10. 1998 the matter was adjourned to 22. 1. 1998. On 22. 1. 1999 a request for time to file Written Statement and Reply was made and an adjournment was granted for this purpose. On 18. 3. 1999, which was the next date of hearing, yet on another request fur- ther time of four weeks for Filing the Written Statement was granted. When the matter came up on 21. 7. 1999 before the Joint Registrar (O) it was noted that the Written Statement had not been filed and hence the matter was placed before Court. On 6. 8. 1998 there was no appearance on behalf of Defendants. In these circumstances, Order 8 Rule 10 was relied upon by the learned counsel for the Plaintiffs and it was pressed before me that the Court should pronounce judgement against the Defendants. Arguments were heard in the suit and judgment was reserved.

( 2 ) ORDER 8 Rule 10 reads as under:

"0. 8 R. IO. When any party from whom a written statement is required











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top