SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 563

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.BUTALIA, R.P.KHATANA

M. S. A. Siddiqui, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under section 482 read other Sections 397/401 Cr. P. C. , the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 26. 10. 1998 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, New Delhi in S. C. No. 203/96 framing charge under Sections 302/34 IPC against the petitioner.

( 2 ) ASHORT conspectus of the case is that the petitioner alongwith the accused persons Jangli Tyagi, Balbir Singh, Lakshmi Chand, Anil Kumar Tyagi and Sushil Kumar were charge-sheeted under Sections 147/148/302/149 IPC. Trial of the case against the petitioner and Lakshmi Chand proceeded under Section 299 Cr. P. C. due to their abscontion during the trial. However, by the judgment dated 19. 1. 1998, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, acquitted the accused Jangli Tyagi, Balbir Singh, Anil Kumar Tyagi and Sushil Kumar Tyagi of the offences charged under Sections 148/302/149 IPC. After the said judgment, the petitioner surrendered himself before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge and sought his discharge on the ground that the other accused persons stand acquitted of the offences charged under sections 148/302/149 IPC. Rejecting the said prayer, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge framed a charge u




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top