SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 620

A.K.SIKRI
G. D. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, ASHA TYAGI, Gaurav Duggal, MUKUL ROHTAGI, VIMLA SINHA

A. K. Sikri, J.

( 1 ) BY this order I shall dispose of CM Nos. 7842/99 and 8025/99.

( 1 ) LET me state the facts in brief first. Petitioner is working as `senior fellow and Head , Higher Education Unit, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (hereinafter referred to as `niepa , for short) New Delhi. He applied for the post of Secretary, University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as `ugc , for short) and on being selected to the said post he was offered the appointment vide communication dated 4th July, 1996 which is inter alia stated as under:-

"on the recommendations made by the Selection Committee, the Commission is pleased to offer you appointment to the post of Secretary, University Grants Commission. The tenure of the post is a period of 5 years from the date you assume charge of the post, or till you attain the age of superannuation in your parent organisation, whichever is earlier. "

( 2 ) ALONGWITH this communication dated 4th July, 1996 terms and conditions of his appointment as Secretary, UGC were also enclosed. On petitioner s accepting the offer of appointment, NIEPA issued Order No. 188/96 dated 8th July, 1996 relieving him as Senior Fel











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top