( 1 ) THE present second appeal has been preferred against the order passed by the Rent Controller Tribunal dated 13th January, 1987 wherein the Tribunal modified the order of the Additional Rent Controller and held that the rate of rent which was to be paid by the respondent-tenant was @ Rs. 55. 00 and not Rs. l25. 00 as was held by the Additional Rent Controller, who passed an order under Section 15 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the respondent has contended that this appeal does not raise any question of law. Rate of rent is not a question of law. I find no force in the argument of learned Counsel for the respondent as it was the basis on which the Rent Control Tribunal had set aside the finding of the Additional Rent Controller which from bare perusal of records seems untenable. The first order for deposit of rent was passed by the Additional Rent Controller on 5th July, 1985 under Section 15 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. In that order it was held that the monthly rent was Rs. 125. 00 per month. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondent preferred an appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal. The appeal of the respondent was di