M.K.SHARMA
SAMARJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR BHASIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THE present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 1. 11. 1997 passed by the Civil Judge. Delhi in Suit No. 159/1995 dismissing the application of the petitioner seeking for amendment of the plaint. The petitioner "as plaintiff instituted a suit in the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Delhi seeking for a declaration that he is the owner, title holder of the suit property and also sought for permanent injunction restraining the respondent from disposing of the same. The respondent filed their written statement contesting the aforesaid suit. Subsequently, an application was filed by respondent/defendant contending inter alia that admittedly the. plaintiff js not inpossession of the suit property and therefore, the relief of permanent injunction could not be availed of by him. It was also stated that the defendants. are in continuous possession and therefore, the plaintiff could not have filed the suit by affixing Rs. 20. 00 only as court fee for declaration only, for in order to avail appropriate relief he is to file a suit for possession by affixing and valorem court fee on the market value of the property. The respondent/de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.