SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 699

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
SHARAD YADAV – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.BAJPAI, ARUN JAITLEY, R.S.PRABHU

M. S. A. Siddiqui,j.

( 1 ) THE present revision petitions are directed against the order dated 1. 8. 1997 passed by Shri V. B. Gupta, Special Judge, Delhi in C. C. No. 44/96 directing to frame charges under Section 120-B Indian Penal Code and under Sections 7/11/12/13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act against the petitioners. By this order, I propose to dispose of these revision petitions.

( 2 ) A short conspectus of the case is that during the years 1988 to 1991, three brothers namely the accused S. K. Jain, B. R. Jain and N. K. Jain entered into a criminal conspiracy among themselves, the object of which was to receive unaccounted money and to disburse the same to their companies, friends, close relatives, highly placed officials and prominent political leaders of the country. In pursuance of the said conspiracy, the accused S. K. Jain, allured certain influential public servants, political leaders of high status including some ministers and Govt. organisations in the power and steel sectors of the Govt. of India to award contracts to different foreign bidders with the motive of getting illegal kickbacks from them. During the aforesaid period, t

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top