SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 730

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
SHAMIM AHMED – Appellant
Versus
KANHAIYA LAL SETH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Shankar, ASHOK GURNANI

Vikramajit Sen

( 1 ) THIS suit has been filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the recovery of Rs. 10,00,000. 00 alongwith interest from the date of the institution of the present proceedings till the realisation thereof at the rate of 18% per annum.

( 2 ) THE plaint discloses that the defendant has claimed to be the owner of land in Village Begumpur, New Delhi and on this representation had entered into an agreement for sale of a portion thereof at the rate of Rs. 2,000. 00 per sq. yd. In furtherance of this agreement a sum of Rs. 2,00,000. 00 was paid by the plaintiff to the defendant in cash on 4. 12. 1994 together with a further sum of Rs. 5,00,000. 00 on 4. 4. 1995 as well as another sum of Rs. 10,00,000. 00. The averments in the plaint are, therefore, that a total sum of Rs. 17,00,000. 00 had been paid. Upon verification it was learnt that the title of the defendant in respect of the suit property was defective and accordingly in part discharge of his liability two cheques bearing Nos. 052346 and 052347 dated 7. 3. 1996 for Rs. 5,00,000. 00 each drawn on Bank of India, Pahar Ganj, Delhi were issued in the name of the plaintiff by the defendant. The p




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top