SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 862

CYRIAC JOSEPH
TAJ SERVICES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-I – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.RAINA, SUNITA BHARDVAJ, VINAY BHASIN

Cyriac Joseph, J.

( 1 ) THIS application is filed on behalf of respondents 2 to 11 in the writ petition under Section 17b of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

( 2 ) THE challenge in the writ Petition is against the award dated 30th September, 1996 of the Industrial Tribunal in I. D. No. 10/88. As per the impugned award the management was directed to reinstate the workmen in service and also to pay to them 50% of back wages from the date of their dismissal from service to the date of the award and full wages from the date of the award to the date of reinstatement in service. While issuing notice on the writ petition and the application for stay (C. M. 997/97) this Court directed that the impugned award shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing. The said stay order was being extended from time to time. Respondent Nos. 2 to 11 in the writ petition are the workmen in whose favour the impugned award was passed. The said workmen have filled the present application for benefits under Section 17b of the Industrial Disputes Act.

( 3 ) THE applicants have stated in the application that they are on the verge of starvation due to prolonged unemployment. It is also stated that they have








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top