SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 870

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
NAROSA PUBLISHING HOUSE – Appellant
Versus
JAGBIR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN KHOSLA, MANISHA SINGH, MIT MALHOTRA, Raghuvinder Singh

Vikramajit Sen, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of I. A. No. 9161/99 in S. No. 182/97, I. A. 9158/99 in S. No. 183/97 and I. A. 9159/99 in S. No. 184/99.

( 2 ) THE Plaintiffs had earlier filed I. As. under Order 11 Rule 12 for the production, particularly, of the following documents:

(I) documents relating to sale transaction executed by the defendant with the 3rd Party.

(II) letters written by the defendant informing the Plaintiff about the completion of the flat in question.

(III) completion certificate issued by the appropriate authority in respect of the premises in question.

(IV) any other document which this Hon ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

( 3 ) THESE applications were allowed by order dated 9. 8. 1999 on the submission of the Defendant s counsel that he will file all the documents called for in the application, which are in his power and possession, within two weeks. Despite these orders no documents were produced by the Defendant, thereby necessitating the filing of the present application seeking the passing of the appropriate orders for striking off the Defendant s defence.

( 4 ) A Reply on behalf of Defendant was stated to ha








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top