Vijender Jain, J. (oral)

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision has been filed aggrieved by an order passed by Additional Rent Controller on 18th April, 1995 whereby an eviction order was passed under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) MR. Ishwar Sahai, Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has contended that accommodation available with the respondents was sufficient and the finding of the Additional Rent Controller was perverse on this score. He has further contended that respondent No. 1 Bhagwati Seth has one bachelor son who is about 50 years old and another son Arun Seth is not residing in India as he is settled with his family in United States of America. He has further contended that another co-owner of the premises Dr. Balraj Seth is 70 years old. His wife is no more. He is occupying the entire first floor consisting of two bed rooms, drawing and dining room. His one son has died. Widow of that son has got re-married. The deceased son has three children. They also live with their mother and they do not require any accommodation in the promises in question. He has further contended that another son of Dr. Balraj is employed in Coal India and presently posted at Na

Click Here to Read the rest of this document