Vijender Jain, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the order passed by the Additional Rent Controller on an eviction petition filed by the respondent- landlord/owner under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the petitioner has filed the present Revision Petition.

( 2 ) MR. Sabharwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has contended that the respondent was not the owner within the meaning of Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. He has contended that as a matter of fact when the premises were let out to the petitioner in the year 1981, the respondent was merely a licensee and he could not have created the tenancy. Mr. Sabharwal has gone to the extent of arguing that as a matter of fact he could not have parted with the possession in terms of the original licence granted by the Delhi Administration in favour of the respondent.

( 3 ) MR. Sabharwal further contended that the Delhi Administration further modified the policy and allotted such kind of premises to such licensees later on. What has been contended before me by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent for the purpose of getting such allotment, mis-represented to the Delhi Adm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document