SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 1096

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
ZOHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
amicus curiae, M.S.BUTALIA, R.K.GAUBA

M. S. A. Siddiqui, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction dated 16. 3. 1995 convicting the appellant under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short `the Act ) and sentencing her to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,00,000. 00 or in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one year.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the prosecution case is that on 5. 9. 1991, a police party led by Inspector Rajeshwar Kumar (Public Witness -7), upon information received, apprehended the appellant near the Tomb of a Muslim Saint outside Sanjay Amar Colony. She was given the option of being searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. The appellant declined the offer. She was then searched in the presence of Dost Modh (Public Witness -4), Constable Jagvir Singh (Public Witness -5), Constable Babu Lal (Public Witness -6) and 560 grams of charas was seized from her rexine bag vide Seizure Memo (Ex. PW-2/c ). The appellant was charged with an offence punishable under Section 20 of the Act and tried.

( 3 ) THE appellant abjured her guilt and alleged that a false case has been foisted on her. Th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top