( 1 ) THIS application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 contained a prayer for the issuance of mandatory injunction against Defendant No. 1, directing him to vote in favour of the Resolution proposed in the notice for the A. G. M. Scheduled to be held on June, 10,1999 or any adjourned meeting thereof and/or to give a praxy in favour of he Plaintiff s representative of the A. G. M. for that date. Since this application came up for consideration before me after this date, the Plaintiff filed a subsequent application being I. A. 9803/1999. The present application has therefore, not been argued since the subsequent application was considered to be comprehensive. Without in any way prejudicing the Plaintiff s cause, and subject to all just exceptions, this Application is dismissed with no order as to costs. I. A. 9804 of 1999

( 2 ) THE facts of the present case pose little controversy. This situation has prompted the presentation of an application of the passing of a decree on admissions, under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Shri Shanti Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Plaintiff has submitted that admittedly the Plaintiff is