MANMOHAN SARIN
CADBURY INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M. C. SAXENA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed the present suit claiming damages of Rs. 2 crores for defamation against defendants 1 and 2. Defendant No. 1 is stated to be the Director of defendant No. 2, the latter claiming to be a research laboratory. Perpetual injunction is sought to restrain the defendants from further writing or publishing or re-publishing, articles, news items containing allegations or defamatory statements similar to those set out in para 5 to 15 of the plaint relating primarily to the Nickel content or use of Nickel in the chocolates manufactured by the plaintiff.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff has averred that the defamatory imputations attributed to defendants were published in a series of articles and write-ups which have been produced alongwith the plaint as exhibits B to H. This suit was transferred from the High Court of Bombay to this Court vide orders of the Supreme Court persuant to the orders passed on 24. 11. 1995. The Defendant entered appearance on 1. 5. 1996 and sought time to file the written statement. Written statement was not filed. Defendants were accordingly proceeded ex-parte on 12. 5. 1998 Defendants thereupon, moved an application, I.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.