SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 1134

MANMOHAN SARIN
CADBURY INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M. C. SAXENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M.OBEROI, P.VENUGOPAL RAO, Surekha Raman, SUSHMITA LAL

Manmohan Sarin, J. (ORAL ).

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed the present suit claiming damages of Rs. 2 crores for defamation against defendants 1 and 2. Defendant No. 1 is stated to be the Director of defendant No. 2, the latter claiming to be a research laboratory. Perpetual injunction is sought to restrain the defendants from further writing or publishing or re-publishing, articles, news items containing allegations or defamatory statements similar to those set out in para 5 to 15 of the plaint relating primarily to the Nickel content or use of Nickel in the chocolates manufactured by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has averred that the defamatory imputations attributed to defendants were published in a series of articles and write-ups which have been produced alongwith the plaint as exhibits B to H. This suit was transferred from the High Court of Bombay to this Court vide orders of the Supreme Court persuant to the orders passed on 24. 11. 1995. The Defendant entered appearance on 1. 5. 1996 and sought time to file the written statement. Written statement was not filed. Defendants were accordingly proceeded ex-parte on 12. 5. 1998 Defendants thereupon, moved an application, I.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top