SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 9

S.N.KAPUR
AJUDHIA DISTILLERY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINISTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.DUA

S. N. Kapoor

( 1 ) THIS judgment shall dispose of petition No. 296a/91 filed under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 as well as I. A. No. 8510/93, objections relating thereto filed by the claimant-petitioner against the award given by Shri D. M. Spolia on 15th October, 1990.

( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner has just argued only one point before this Court relating to the claim of the petitioner about enhanced Excise Duty and submits that Section 64-A of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 has not been applied in its proper perspective.

( 3 ) RELEVANT facts of the case are as under:

3. 1. In response to tenders of the petitioner M/s. Ajudhia Distillery Ltd. Co. a formal agreement dated 10th December, 1984 was entered into for the wholesale supply of 50 degree U. P. Rum in the Union Territory of Delhi for the period starting from November 9, 1984 to 31st March ,1985. The supply rates per dozen of 750 ml. and 375 ml. bottles respectively included Excise Duty of 1. 20 and 0. 60 and Export Duty of Rs. 4. 80 and 2. 40.

3. 2. During the contract period Government of Uttar Pradesh from where the Rum was exported, enhanced the Export Duty on 50 degree Rum vide Notification No. 241-2/13-















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top